A boardroom audit gives a table a way to evaluate their performance in a thorough manner. It helps tables identify weaknesses in their leadership and culture and also aspects of longevity. It also assists in ensuring that those who pay for table membership are able to perform their duties.
This research field is still evolving and many issues remain. The evidence available at present shows mixed results on how dissent impacts boards and their performance. While some studies have reported positive (Zona 2016) and curvilinear impacts, others find negative (Brown, Buchholtz and Butts 2019), non-significant or mixed results (Heemskerk, Heemskerk, and Wats 2015; Minichilli et al. 2012) relations between dissent and the performance boardroombook.com/ of a board’s tasks.
The literature does not offer an in-depth understanding of what factors influence the dynamics of dissension. To better understand the context of this governance phenomenon, it’s worthwhile for future research to develop a more integrative theoretical approach. This could include the use of a configurational approach (Federo and Saz-Carranza 2018, Schiell, Lewellyn, and Yan 2023) to assist researchers to more precisely understand how individual board attributes as well as processes and contexts connect to the need for and sufficient causality in governance phenomenon.
In the end, some studies employ a narrow definition for disagreement but do not offer precise measurement methods. These studies are therefore vulnerable to measurement error. Therefore, it’s beneficial to continue studies to develop more robust and precise dissent measurement methods.